Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbital Corporation Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn with  consensus to keep. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Orbital Corporation Limited

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Well there is an abundance of press releases and some releases of financial statements, but no evidence of coverage of the company.It appears to have reduced emissions, which is a GoodThing, but not necessarily notable. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 01:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn, see below. Withdrawn per information above. I thought I looked under the old name but clearly something was wrong with my search. I almost think the old name needs to be created as a re-direct since it appears to be far more known and notable then the new name. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 02:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Slightly adevertising. I certainly cant see what's so notable about the company, no reliable sources unless Im mistaken. Fattyjwoods  ( Push my button  ) 02:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found an interesting article from the Sydney Morning Herald and added it as a reference. --Eastmain (talk) 02:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and cleanup/expand. The company has a revolutionary product and signed agreements with GM and Ford, and has many thousands of reference points --Россавиа Диалог 02:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.