Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orcas at SeaWorld


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, due to a lack of sources. If sources are found, feel free to take the article to DRV with them. lifebaka++ 12:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Orcas at SeaWorld

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Yeah, I just found this one when checking the what links here on the other page. Momo Hemo (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT#DIR. List is not notable and information, if relevant should be incorporated into the respective park pages (most of it already is on the park's page or the individual orca pages). Article has been tagged as unsourced for almost a year. Momo Hemo (talk) 20:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Indiscriminate information, directory listing. Didn't we just go through this with a different title? No, that was just another list of orcas in all parks. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:11, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. If a list of orcas in captivity in general is not notable, neither is this.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 21:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What, nobody wants to make lists for otters? :-P Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 05:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 05:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not convinced by the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument above. Also, the list is not indiscriminate as it focuses on a specific subject. It's also not compiled in such a way as to suggest lack of context outside of a mere "list".  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 07:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, lack of sources is not a reason to delete. It should be an impetus to improve.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 07:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.