Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orchestra of the Music Makers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This is one of several articles nominated with the exact same boilerplate rationale. The consensus is to keep and fix. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor 18:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Orchestra of the Music Makers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The musicians discussed in this article do not meet the criteria for notability in music as outlined in Wikipedia's guidelines. All reliable source coverage listed is local. WP:BAND and WP:MUSICBIO criteria are not met. The article is biased, it is written as though it were trying to advertise for or promote the musicians discussed within. The musicians themselves have no strong claim and very little regional/international renown. InspectorMikeChin (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong keep The article clearly satisfy WP:BAND #1 and WP:GNG with significant independent coverage in reliable sources. The claim that the coverage being merely local is a strange one, I have not heard of the requirement for international coverage given that WP:BAND specifically allows for local significance. In any case, there are numerous sources in what is the biggest and perhaps the most important newspaper of Singapore, e.g., there are also international coverage from outside Singapore . They have also played outside Singapore - e.g. at Cheltenham Music Festival - .  If there is any issue with the article, then try to fix it, rather than trying to delete an article that has clear notability.  Note however that this appears that this is just one of a number of identical and apparently indiscriminate nominations by the same person, so I'm not sure if the claim of bias has any substance in it. Hzh (talk) 10:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and fix. The article already demonstrates the subject's notability, as Hzh demonstrates above.  The tone of the current version is promotional in parts, and needs attention, but that should be addressed by editing, not deletion.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Procedural Close/Keep All - For all recent AfDs by this nominator. See comments by myself and others at Articles for deletion/HubbaBubbas. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 18:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.