Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orchid Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Orchid Software

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP. The sources are either links to download product, or reports of corporate fundraising, no WP:SIGCOV. A search returns several other Orchid Software companies (Spa admin, laser cutting, and one in the Caribbean) with this Orchid only returning its own website and this wiki page. Cabayi (talk) 08:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


 * delete - unable to find significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Fails notability. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 01:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * delete - like most small to medium software companies, it's just not notable enough. They may sell to large clients but that doesn't make them independently notable. Can't find any real reliable references or coverage. Canterbury Tail talk 13:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * keep - Thank you for this advice. Having updated the article it now includes more examples of notability than similar other articles. Website links have been removed. Section on Funding History was removed. I have tried, please reconsider AfD argument. Note a redirect from Oak Intranet may be required. User:Adriantaylor2 23:36, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The newly added citations don't meet WP:CORPDEPTH, and sources outside of the article are no better. —  Newslinger  talk   11:53, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.