Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orders of magnitude (volume)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Volume. Although several votes were to keep, almost all of them were based on human opinion; therefore this will be redirected for the timebeing per WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN. If you feel that there may be an issue, please see WP:DRV. (non-admin closure) FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 21:46, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Orders of magnitude (volume)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Half of the stuff is unsourced and the article fails WP:LISTN.Synthesis of data. And, if someone do manage to find such trivial list(s) in high-school/undergrad science text-book (which often have them to provide an indicative idea of the vastness of the real range of a physical quantity), we are not one.We are an encyclopedia. &#x222F; WBG converse 05:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment This article is part of a set – see the following navigational template. It doesn't make sense to consider this in isolation when other members of the set have been extensively discussed and kept previously.  For example, see RfC, AfD.  Andrew D. (talk) 11:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, w umbolo   ^^^  07:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Speedy Keep This is a very comprehensive list, for a common quantity, and it is definitely notable. It also has a lot of images to explain what is written. — Eli355 ( talk  •  contribs ) 00:41, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:11, 31 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.