Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordningsvakt




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW keep. BD2412 T 03:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Ordningsvakt

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Sweden. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep the distincion between ordningsvakt (with limited peace officer authority) and väktare (regular security guard) is important. The latter doesn't need a Swedish standalone article, but the ordningsvakt does. Draken Bowser (talk) 07:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable and passes WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep the distincion between ordningsvakt (a security police officer authority) and väktare (a security guard) is important. The latter doesn't need a Swedish standalone article, but the ordningsvakt does. After all there is a Security police article which has been on wikipedia for years.Degen Earthfast (talk) 12:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - This article is in desperate need of a rewrite, not deletion. The term is used across RS and the general web (including English versions of job sites like Indeed and Glassdoor) which definitely clears the GNG hurdle. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 15:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:GNG is met. Sources are ok, but can always be improved.BabbaQ (talk) 13:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, GNG is definitely met for Ordningsvakt as a specific office in Swedish law, distinct from security guards as a whole. --AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.