Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oredog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep - withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) - MrX 20:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Oredog

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a non-notable subject and possibly a hoax. Unable to find any reliable sources. - MrX 14:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn - With a self-inflicted trout for not waiting a little longer for the article to be developed. The COI external link, the state of the article when I nominated it and the fact that it's April Fool's day seemed to add up to a hoax. This is evidently not the case. - MrX 20:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The topic appears notable as a specialization of working dog. The cited references appear valid (although my Finnish is a bit rusty).  The article is a mess, and needs cleanup.  And the conflict of interest of the author should be noted, but I think there is salvageable content here.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems like a real thing. Would it be called an oredog or an ore dog in the English language though?  I did some minor work on the article.  Trying to delete something a just minutes after it is created, is always a bad idea.  The article's creator went on to make a lot of additions after the nomination.  If historical documents in the article show this is true, then its encyclopedic enough to be in the Wikipedia.   D r e a m Focus  19:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.