Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus to delete, default is keep  Jody B   talk 20:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page is little more than a PR rewrite describing the actions of a small group of people. Dakdakdak 04:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The article named in the title of this section/transcluded page doesn't appear to be the one nominated for deletion. --ElKevbo 04:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Actually, this page is little more than a redirect to an article on a public university, which I would assume to be notable. Maxamegalon2000 14:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait, now I'm just confused. --Maxamegalon2000 14:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment. From the nom's edit history, it appears that what xe intended to nominate was Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine. I've attempted to emend this page to indicate that; hope it works. Deor 15:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is not part of the University of Oregon (if it were, it wouldn't be separately notable). They call their senior staff faculty, but there are no students. Its an independent institute with an ambiguous title, & notable, it's because of its extremely controversial path. But there need to be some independent references. Otherwise, merge with the article on its founder. DGG 03:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Just to clarify, for anyone who may be coming in late: The article name that originally appeared in this AfD was Oregon Health and Sciences University, which is what ElKevbo and Maxamegalon2000 were commenting on above. Deor 04:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep. There's not really enough evidence of notability in the article, but this group's role in the Oregon Petition might make it notable as a separate organization. I don't have a problem with redirecting to Arthur B. Robinson. If the article is kept, it should be made clear that this organization is regarded as a political organization/think-tank rather than an academic/research organization. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletions.   --  Pablo   Talk  |  Contributions  05:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete very little evidence of any notability.-- Sef rin gle Talk 05:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, recent news and 180 archived news. John Vandenberg 06:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 11:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.