Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orenair Flight 2554


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:10, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Orenair Flight 2554

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This event is unusual, but is not so uncommon that it needs an article. It does not meet the criteria of WP:EVENTCRITERIA (no lasting effect, not widely reported in news) or the notability guidelines of the Aviation WikiProject. AHeneen (talk) 17:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - routine engine failure, nothing to see here. Mjroots (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - a really common occurance handled safely not worth a mention in wikipedia. MilborneOne (talk) 20:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable aviation incident....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete pretty article, but very ordinary Leondz (talk) 08:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability????? mundane engine failure properly handled with NO consequences--Petebutt (talk) 14:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - occurs commonly around the world, almost every day. No unusual outcomes here, clearly not notable. SempreVolando (talk) 05:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment as always, this should be deleted as there's no notability. The only abnormal thing is that the aircraft hasn't actually flown since the incident A340swazzen (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as unlikely for any necessary improvements, unlikely to become a blooming larger article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.