Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organic Union International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:00, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Organic Union International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No relevant references. Promotional. Possibly delusional/quackery Rathfelder (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete A promotional article per WP:PROMOTION. No news articles/nothing I could find for note-worthy keep. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 23:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is a brief name-check in an e-book though that is of unknown importance and reliability. I don't see that as sufficient evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The article is vague and doesn't seem to convey much by way of useful detail. As already noted above, there is a lack of reliable sources- there are remarks in ebooks indicating that the organisation was used as a vehicle to promote a theory, but this isn't enough to establish notability. Drchriswilliams (talk) 17:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Drchriswilliams on this. I've read the article and it is very vague. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.