Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organically Derived Communism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Organically Derived Communism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Neologism that doesn't exist outside this article. See for example Google:  OpenFuture (talk) 06:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per above. --OpenFuture (talk) 06:29, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not much else to say, there is no indication in any google search that this term is used outside of this article, no news, web, scholar or book hits out side of wikipedia or a single blog that mnentions this article.  GB fan  talk 06:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete - what else describes the emergence of a communist state based on abundant energy rather than one having been forced on the people by a physical revolutionary force or other? There is ample debate for centuries about the role of energy and scarcity-of-energy in a communist state. See http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Economics Section: Economics and other disciplines: Last two paragraphs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.164.34.109 (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)  — 74.164.34.109 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The link you provided does not use the term Organically Derived Communism anywhere. To have an article we need to show that the term is used in reliable sources.  I have looked and can not find the term anywhere.  If others have not used the term we can't use it.  Wikipedia only summarizes what reliable sources say about a subject.   GB fan  talk 14:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There are several other names for the same thing. You are not the first one to have these impossible fantasies about unlimited resources. See for example The Venus Project. --OpenFuture (talk) 21:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. No reliable sources exist which discuss the concept, nor are any examples provided in the article. Accordingly, the article seems to be about a new concept, or at least a newly-coined term for one. Either way, it doesn't deserve an article. —C.Fred (talk) 14:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources, no article. LibStar (talk) 08:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.