Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organisation of the Polish Nation - Polish League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Let&#39;srun (talk) 20:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Organisation of the Polish Nation - Polish League

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:ORGCRITE, coverage in independent secondary sources is fleeting. Cited sources include an opinion piece that does not appear to make mention of the topic, press releases from the organization itself , press releases for a counter-protest against an action called by ONP-LP , and mere mentions in higher quality sources. Searching online, on Google Scholar, and on Google Books for various permutations of the organization's name and acronym in English and Polish, I was not able to find significant coverage. signed,Rosguill talk 18:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism, Organizations, Politics,  and Poland. signed,Rosguill talk 18:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment I do not want to directly participate in the vote since I am the person behind the article, and I want to apologize since I created this article when my experience was somewhat lacking, and I relied heavily on translating the page from Polish Wikipedia.
 * I would argue that the quality of the sources for the party is less of the problem of the party being that irrelevant (it participated in elections, which makes it more important than half of the 1990s Polish parties that have articles), and has more with me not doing a good job here. I apologize for my shortcomings and I will try to improve the article in the coming days.
 * I managed to find following secondary sources that give more information on the party beyond a mere mention:
 * Lakomy Lilianna. (2008). Komunikacja perswazyjna w języku polityki na przykładzie polskich kampanii prezydenckich. Praca doktorska. Katowice : Uniwersytet Śląski;
 * Jacek Harłukowicz. (2005). Kandydat szuka niszy. https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/kandydat-szuka-niszy-6037504817279617a;
 * Paweł Malendowicz. (2013). Polonia amerykańska wobec członkostwa Polski w NATO i Unii Europejskiej. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej. Bygdoszcz;
 * Jarosław Tomasiewicz. (2002). Powrót Ligi. Sprawy Polityczne;
 * Marcin Kornak. (2008). Katolog wypadków – „Brunatna Księga”. NIGDY WIĘCEJ nr 16.
 * Thank you. Brat Forelli🦊  18:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep, the article was clearly improved to a good standard. Polish kurd (talk) 21:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - after improving article, I believe that the amount of references providing non-trivial mentions is sufficient to keep it.
 * Brat Forelli🦊 14:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, article seems relevant to me and I believe the references should meet notability requirements. I also believe it has been improved and well worked on. Mevoelo (talk)


 * Keep Has contested multiple national elections and received 60,000 votes in one of them. Clearly a notable political party IMO. Number   5  7  01:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article has been expanded since nomination and cites RS. It would be good to hear from the nom if they find this satisfactory now? @Rosguill Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I tried following up on the sources identified by Brat Forelli above--the only ones I was able to access were Lakomy 2008 and Harlukowicz 2005--Lakomy 2008 does comprise significant coverage, but Harlukowicz appears to be just a mere mention. So, I still haven't actually seen enough coverage to meet ORGCRITE, but it is possible that the other sources cited that I was unable to access have such coverage. signed,Rosguill talk 15:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.