Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organise!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Solidarity Federation. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Organise!

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a total lack of independent sources, a non notable anarchist organisation. Fails WP:GNG Finnegas (talk) 16:55, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The article hasn't been updated with new content in nearly four years, and the organisation doesn't actually exist anymore; they recently dissolved themselves into SolFed. -- Wetdogmeat (talk) 20:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  01:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)




 * Comment - I would say this article needs a dramatic rewrite and even shortening. The references don't give enough coverage for the current length, but I would say it's hard to decide if they are notable in its current state. I think when it is shortened, notability will be much clearer if there is any. Verdict78 (talk) 15:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  22:50, 11 August 2013 (UTC)




 * Redirect to SolFed, for now, with no prejudice against recreation in the future. If they have been dissolved into that organisation, there would seem to be no harm in our treating them the same way, given the seemingly insufficient coverage to substantiate WP:ORGDEPTH. But if someone finds enough coverage in the future (if someone writes a book or the group becomes active again, for example), they shouldn't be prevented from creating a new article from the redirect. Redirecting will also save the edit history for that purpose. Stalwart 111  02:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.