Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organization of Indian kingdoms during invasions and facts related to the wars.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ask?  10:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Organization of Indian kingdoms during invasions and facts related to the wars.
Thoroughly unencyclopedic article, consists entirely of (literal?) excerpts from a single book, might raise copyright issues too. Basically a POV fork of Islamic conquest of South Asia. It's linked to from a single page, Rajput, the site of one of the worst recent POV disputes, whose link text makes it clear it's intended as POV pushing: "There is a big misconception that India was conquered very easily by Muslims. Facts are very different and are discussed on the page pointed to by the heading of this section or click here". Lukas (T. 21:03, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete this page, thoroughly encyclopedify the contents, and merge with the relevant section of the Rajput article. deeptrivia (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a horrible POV fork. Stifle 16:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. This is an article which is from a book to counter the stereotype that India was conquered easily by Islam.  I would encourage people voting for delete to challenge the historical accuracy of this article.  Each and every point mentioned in this article is historically true.  Lukas is resorting to wiki stalking because I challenged his beliefs on Max Muller and Aryan Invasion theory.  Shivraj Singh 18:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * delete, add the Hunter reference to Islamic conquest of South Asia if not already there. dab (&#5839;) 19:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * delete&mdash; goethean &#2384; 19:36, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Wiktibooks if the authorof the book agree's,otherwise delete Wisesabre 13:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * delete Tom Radulovich 19:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Stay off this article. Wikipedia is the place where Indian history can be revisited by removing all the western propaganda stuffed into it by the racist british rulers. This article is a valuable attempt in this direction. Sisodia 07:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Excellent article on the failure of the Turk invasion of India...it broadly points out the reasons why the vast Indian continent was never conquered and why its people could not be converted to Islam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.2.21.186 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.