Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organization of Triangles Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Grand Lodge of New York.  MBisanz  talk 23:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Organization of Triangles Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 22:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: I could find no significant coverage in reliable sources. Does not appear to meet our notability threshold. Safehaven86 (talk) 04:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: A bit more input is desirable. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge and redirect to Grand Lodge of New York, of which it's a youth group. Not much out there, but enough for a paragraph in the New York Freemasons article. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:44, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Website for Organization of Triangles can be found at OOTNY.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.75.97.195 (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge per Clarityfiend, and leave behind a redirect from Organization of Triangles (i.e. without the trailing Inc) pointing to Grand Lodge of New York; that's a much better search term. A selective merge of just the key points would make more sense than dropping in the full text.  -- RoySmith (talk) 12:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.