Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organizational Healing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Biblio worm  16:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Organizational Healing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possible original research. Lack of sources. Oscarthecat (talk) 21:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: Agreed. Without references, how can facts be verified or notability be established? ubiquity (talk) 22:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete: Meets A7 in my view. No indication of importance. It is also unsourced. Drchriswilliams (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly a term, but per WP:NOTDICT, doesn't belong here. And the assertion of who coined the term is completely unsourced.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.