Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organogallium peroxides


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Organogallium chemistry.  MBisanz  talk 00:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Organogallium peroxides

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As noted at COI, the Organogallium peroxides article largely is the creation of User:Halvagar and the cited sources are papers written by M. R. Halvagar, both having Halvaga in common. User:Halvagar keeps removing tags place on the article. The topic alredy is covered in Organogallium chemistry, and there is no apparent reason to WP:FORK or WP:SPINOUT a Organogallium peroxides article. Delete. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect Merge with Organogallium chemistry. May be worth placing a semi-protect or temporary full protect on the resulting articles to prevent any vandalism, revert wars or similar. Lukeno94 (talk) 15:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge. Overall, I agree with the nominator, but organogallium peroxides are not mentioned in the organogallium chemistry article, so deleting without merging the content is not an option. Ratzd&#39;mishukribo (talk) 15:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, oops. Changed my vote based on this. Lukeno94 (talk) 20:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge - That the article is currently a WP:SELFCITE job (and that Halvagar is not a collaborative editor) doesn't mean the topic is not notable -and indeed there are articles in the literature not authored by mr.Halvagar (e.g. this). I'd say the information he added does not deserve being lost. -- Cycl o pia talk  17:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: Perhaps this is the wrong venue? The issue seems to be one of appropriate style or editorial conduct, not of article content. Ratzd&#39;mishukribo (talk) 19:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge with Organogallium chemistry. This doesn't merit its own article; appears to be nothing more than an attempt by the author of a scientific paper to promote himself through WP:SELFCITE.  Qworty (talk) 00:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose, deletion is over the top, the existing tags on this page should have been sufficient and dealt with: one merge tag and one note-of-tone tag. The article creator should be given an opportunity to improve on the article V8rik (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge the editor who created this needs the additional guidance of working with the existing editors at the main article in order to temper his self-promotional tendancies. If the section for peroxides becomes unruly, it could be spun back out. Gigs (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: The article now contains a section on organoaluminum peroxides, which, if merged, will need to be split and merged to organoaluminum chemistry - or perhaps both should be merged to organometallic chemistry in a new section: "Peroxides"? Ratzd&#39;mishukribo (talk) 16:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.