Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organoid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Zoids: Chaotic Century. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Organoid

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This fictional topic does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete as in-universe and unnotable. Eusebeus (talk) 23:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unverifiable and too much in-universe content. You need some to properly describe something fictional, but this is fragmenting Zoids material needlessly. I thought redirecting would be a good idea, but apparently it's also a medical term. - Mgm|(talk) 00:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge whatever turns out to be verifiable. At least some of it appears to be per . - Mgm|(talk) 22:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with Eusebeus, in-universe and unnotable --Elassint (talk) 00:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Reasonable combination article. The group of these is of importance within the general topic and best handled together. The fictional source itself is sufficiently reliable, so there is no OR. The "in-universe" rule only requires that it be clear that these objects are fictonal. The  argument about separate coverage shows that this nomination does not even apply to the article, as its a combination article, and not individual coverage.  Given that, i do not see this as a good faith nomination, merely the copypaste of the same reason on all superficially similar articles on a topic. DGG (talk) 05:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge. I'm not sure what the policy on combination articles is, but it doesn't seem to need a separate page from Zoids: Chaotic Century. Juzhong (talk) 06:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge No evidence of notability to support need for separate article, but would be good to include as appropriate in the main article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator no evidence of real world notability, lacks coverage by reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 16:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.