Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orgment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Orgment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find any reliable source coverage of this company. Sam Walton (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 20.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and I frankly would've speedied and or PRODed this as this is exactly the material I've been searching for to nominate for deletion either speedy, PROD or AfD. Searches found nothing at all which is not surprising. SwisterTwister   talk  05:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I get zero hits in Google and news, which is pretty amazing. The references here are to related topics (e.g. "digital") but are not about the company itself. LaMona (talk) 02:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Based on the lack of third-party sources and no particular coverage coming up in a google search, I would suspect this is a hoax article. Are we even sure this company exists? Dimadick (talk) 10:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.