Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ori Allon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --MuZemike 02:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Ori Allon

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is not the subject of non-trivial coverage by multiple, independent third-party sources, a WP:BASIC requirement. Rather, he gets mention in coverage of companies, which may or may not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH, but which do not inure to this subject. Even if this subject were to WP:INHERIT some notability from the coverage, it's worth noting that the coverage exists because his companies were acquired by Google and Twitter, mostly indicating notability for the buyers. This subject certainly doesn't inherit anything from Google or Twitter, and his activities otherwise don't seem notable as far as I can tell. JFHJr (㊟) 19:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - The sources might establish notability for the algorithm, not for Allon himself. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article has at least two good sources, and, easily satisfying WP:GNG and way more than is often accepted.  Msnicki (talk) 00:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)




 * Strong Delete - Techcrunch is SPS, Msnicki . Julpan is SPS. The whole second paragraph requires proof.

Agree with JFHJr, “...companies were acquired by Google and Twitter, mostly indicating notability for the buyers”, not for the non-notable Ori Allon. It fails WP:BASIC. It fails WP:GNG as sources may establish notability for the algorithm, definitely not for the subject himself. Liilllyyy (talk) 16:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Liilllyyy


 * Move article to Orion search engine algorithm or similar. The algorithm appears to be notable, its creator, not so much.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete as per ItsZippy and Liilllyyy. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.