Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oribe Peralta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It's snowing here. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 08:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Oribe Peralta

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources provided... ProfPolySci45 (talk) 01:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes provided; in ext links. Locador (talk) 01:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * keep - a member of a national team; verifiable. References are easily searchable; just nobody cares. But laziness is not a reason for deletion. Locador (talk) 01:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, possibly speedy keep. I don't follow the reasoning for this nomination. A link to the player's page at mediotiempo.com is duly provided; that online publication appears to be the standard source for Mexican football per WikiProject Football/Links, so I don't understand the claim of "no sources". He plays in the Mexican First Division and clearly passes WP:NFOOTY.  More than 5,000 hits on GNews provide ample material to expand what appears to me to be a routinely valid stub about a notable player. --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Someone who has played for a very popular and notable football league, and one of the best ones at that, is automatically notable per WP:NSPORT. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:46, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - the article has a source provided (Medio Tiempo external link) and is about a notable professional football player. Jogurney (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly notable, article needs improving, not deleting. Did the nominator even perform WP:BEFORE and search for more sources? GiantSnowman 17:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - There are sources to show that this page meets WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. – Michael (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Easily passes WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.