Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Original blessing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lack of sources is a problem for this article. Stifle (talk) 08:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Original blessing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A parochial concept from the New Thought movement that has not received wider consideration or third party consideration. Useful content can be merged with Matthew Fox. ScienceApologist (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge, by all means merge this material with the Matthew Fox article. My argument for keeping it as it is is that it is an important topic in Christian theology, and when a person seeking information does a search, the article will be there. What is all this officious busy work in deleting articles all of a sudden? Wikipedia should cover every conceivable topic. Another point is that it is an antithetical position to Original Sin.--Drboisclair (talk) 21:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per WP:Notability (books), we expect to see independent third-party coverage, showing the book's importance, and evidence of the notice that has been paid to it, to justify keeping a separate article on a book. Given that the article has no sources, there may not be enough material here to be worth merging. EdJohnston (talk) 21:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Matthew Fox (priest). —— Martinphi    ☎ Ψ Φ —— 21:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy merge to Matthew Fox (priest). No need for AfD when mergeto will do. - Eldereft (cont.) 21:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Matthew Fox (priest) - it's a term invented and used by him. So it can be a simple paragraph in the bio.  Shot info (talk) 01:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge no sources, no assertion of notability. Dlabtot (talk) 03:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent sources. Smells like OR Annette46 (talk) 03:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Possible OR. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.