Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orillia Park Street Collegiate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per consensus, (closed by non-admin) RMHED (talk) 19:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orillia Park Street Collegiate

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Another School with unclear notability Montchav (talk) 13:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, high/secondary school precedent. -Royalguard11 (T·R!) 19:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. High Schools are not notable inheritently. GJ (talk) 20:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * While in principle I agree with you, I wish you lots of luck getting any kind of consensus for that as an actual policy statement. Bearcat (talk) 17:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   --  Double Blue  (Talk) 21:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant high school in its community. Sources available from which the page can be expanded. We develop Wikipedia by keeping and growing stubs not deleting them. TerriersFan (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The article provides context to assert the notability of the subject. Obviously the article does not provide sufficient content to domonstrate its notability, so we should all punish it harshly by calling it a stub and pressing the edit button on it. JERRY talk contribs 14:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:N with some prominent alumni, even more sources are bound to be added, since they can be presumed to exist for all secondary schools. Noroton (talk) 20:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Expanded and cleaned-up since nomination. Verifiable and NPOV. Double Blue  (Talk) 22:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - in its present state it's not bad for a school article. Reggie Perrin (talk) 17:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Comments on talk page are enough. I didnt get where I am today without agreeing with Reg Perrin Victuallers (talk) 15:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.