Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orion Energy Systems, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 00:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Orion Energy Systems, Inc.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N and lacks notable references. S-J-S-F-M-W (talk) 03:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Company is a major employer in the Manitowoc area and western Sheboygan County and NASDAQ-listed. Not every company has to be a GE to be notable. 437 G-hits and 17 current month G-News hits.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:35, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, but only due to NASDAQ listing. Needs reliable sources. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep A NASDAQ listed company is enough notability. Its not like its some OTC company that no one has ever heard of or cares about. I will add a reference tag to it as it its rather unreferenced. — ASPENSTI — TALK  — CONTRIBUTIONS  00:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Two of these books appear to be reliable and independent, and to have significant coverage of the subject. There may also be some independent sources here, but I'm not prepared to wade through the hundreds of press releases to find them. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There are 3800 companies on NASDAQ; that's hardly a qualification for "notable." This article is an obvious plant by the company, which keeps on trying to add hype to the article. Absolutely no reason for this company to have an encyclopedia article.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.