Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orion Mills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Orion Mills

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - These sources show he is notable in the US Virgin Islands and USA: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. In addition, he is a young, already internationally capped player with an ongoing career, and is mentioned in countless match reports and videos. I feel like the nominator specifically tries to delete only football articles en masse for no reason. I look at the other sports WikiProjects and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30.  Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 07:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. Sources above not enough in my views. If further sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 08:58, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. WRA and VIMSIA aren't independent of Mills. The other sources just mention him. Dougal18 (talk) 11:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Hack (talk) 12:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. WRA source: obviously not independent ❌. VIMSIA source: blog and not independent ❌. Akron Beacon Journal: 1/2 of one sentence in a 2-sentence PR announcement of a youth award ❌. St Thomas Source 1: name appears in a list in a press release ❌. Virgin Islands Daily News: name appears in a list in a press release ❌. St Thomas Source 2: name appears in a list in a press release ❌., please stop linking to sources that clearly auto-fail GNG as it wastes everyone's time having to assess them. JoelleJay (talk) 22:09, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing evidence for notability from independent secondary sources--Littehammy (talk) 23:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - passing mentions and routine blog coverage do not amount to a passing of GNG. Also fails WP:SPORTBASIC as well. Comments about the number of footballers being sent to AfD is irrelevant and not a valid argument for keeping an article on this footballer. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.