Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oritsewinor Kevin Olu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus. Fails notability guidelines as described according to several relevant policies/guidelines. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Oritsewinor Kevin Olu

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable business person and certainly doesn’t need NPOL despite the attempt to make it appear so. PRAXIDICAE💕 23:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Strong keep : wow, wow, wow lol I hope other contributors can also read from here User_talk:Praxidicae. You never said the article didn’t passes WP:GNG which of course it does with a lot of notable reliable references from Vanguard (Nigeria), The Sun (Nigeria), The Guardian (Nigeria) and so on when search on Google rather you called it a non notable business person without a proof lol. Subject article passes WP:GNG and as a politician he passes WP:POLITICIAN. He has gained significant coverage from different reliable source over the years as a Political party member of the PDP, Elected in various positions over the years and currently the SSA on security matters to the current governor of Delta State. @Praxidicae I believe you AFD the article not because it has any issue but because you already had your threaten statement but still I go stand for peace & hope you do too --Gabriel601 (talk) 01:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Despite the creating editor's obvious strong feelings that this is a notable politician, he fails WP:NPOLITICIAN since he has only been a "Former : House of assembly aspirant Warri north delta state PDP" which means he has never been elected. The references show a person who aspires to, but has not achieved notability. Even the picture shows him arranged in a self aggrandising posture.He does not meet the criteria for WP:BIO. He is an assistant, doubtless important to the role he assists, but not notable in a Wikipedia sense. There is no issue with the references being WP:RS, but they lack independence, being interviews with Olu, not being about Olu. Thus they are primary sources. Regrettably, this was a disputed draftification, made against strong advice. I cannot suggest re-draftification since I do not believe that Olu has inherent notability. When he does he may have an article about him here I wish the creating editor had not moved the draft back to mainspace and would have taken advice. The foregoing would have been my WP:AFC review. Now it is my AfD opinion. It was not appropriate for dratification instead of AfD, because that would have been move warring 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians,  and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The article features categories that claim this individual is a member of the Senate while the article Delta State Peoples Democratic Party claims he is a member of the House of Representatives representing Warri. I have been unable to substantiate those claims. AusLondonder (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @AusLondonder I believe the article is constructed such that the reader might believe that Olu is what he is not. The categories are of particular interest and I had not noticed them previously. I have firm doubts that Category:Members of the Senate (Nigeria) or Category:Delta State politicians should be present. I find it a deceptive article. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , . It is indeed a possible deceptive article. Next year (2023) is election year in Nigeria, it is my opinion that politicians may be trying to boost their image. Now, I’m looking at a more serious issue, which is the creator of the article might have breached our TOU, I’m going to take a closer look and file reports accordingly before tomorrow. Celestina007 (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per nom, this article is not only lacking in sources, but has all the trapping of possible undeclared paid editing, see move warring which is mentioned in UPESIGN#5 Tbh one of the many reasons I can afford to take a wiki-break is primarily because of the existence of, she is extremely sound in dealing with Nigeria related articles which is extremely difficult and also because of existence of anti spam. Now this article is the quintessential example of an WP:ADMASQ which fails every known notability criterion or criteria for inclusion. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 22:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The sources are all either interviews, or have a strong 'press release' feel about them, or both - I'm not seeing organic in-depth coverage in RS. I get the sense that Wikipedia is being used as an extension to someone's PR campaign, which I object to. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete — interviews, fails the general notability guidelines. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 17:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.