Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orlacher Bach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  10:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Orlacher Bach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Do we have WP:GEOLAND1E? This appears to be it. This is just a random NN stream, written about because of a local news event, and WP:NOTNEWS. MSJapan (talk) 09:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * There is a very well-developed article in German at de:Orlacher Bach. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. As notes there is sufficient material to support an article about this named natural feature as part of our gazeteer function as described in WP:GEOLAND. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I do want to make it clear I was commenting, not casting a !vote. As the nominator has pointed out in the past, the guideline does "specifically exclude maps," which I see does comprise a lot of the sourcing on the German wiki article. Perhaps I should have simply said "detailed" rather than "well-developed." Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:29, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as the flood probably makes it notable, or alternatively Redirect to a tribs section of the Kocher...Jokulhlaup (talk) 16:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.