Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orlando (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Appears to meet WP:N Wily D 09:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Orlando (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged as needing sources since 2009, with none forthcoming and I can't turn anything decent up. Not seeing much to get it past WP:BAND to be honest. Hiding T 16:34, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. The substantial bio and album review at Allmusic and the band's entry in The Encyclopedia of Popular Music are sufficent to satisfy notability criteria. They were one of the biggest bands of the Romo movement and got quite a bit of press back in the mid-90s, as indicated in CMJ New Music Monthly. Further coverage here and here which, while brief, demonstrate the band's importance to the genre. --Michig (talk) 19:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * From memory they got very little press back in the mid-90's, tiny snippets and the one 8 page spread in the Maker that CMJ mention, which doesn't amount to quite a bit of press. NME didn't cover it at all.  Hiding T 20:53, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep with thanks to Michig for providing coverage. Drmies (talk) 21:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Plenty of non-trivial, independent coverage to show that WP:MUSICBIO is met. — sparklism  hey! 07:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.