Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orleans Park School

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep due to no consensus. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:22, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Orleans Park School
No evidence of notability. Just another crap article about a school Dunc|&#9786; 14:01, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Another good school stub. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:38, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, there's no consensus that schools need to be specially "notable". Kappa 15:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into an area schools article. Will these school delete attempts ever end? &mdash; RJH 17:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge into an area schools article. NeoJustin 17:32, June 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Special" notability is one thing. Being definable for any characteristics whatever that make it different from a donut shop (building with kids in it) would be nice. Having a character, a history, or anything else that demonstrates that this is an entity that has a unique place would be a real bonus. Geogre 17:45, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - reasonable stub. DS1953 17:48, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with the appropriate geographical article, to keep the school inclusionists happy. --Carnildo 18:42, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - no reason to delete. Christopher Parham (talk) 18:43, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless substub. Gamaliel 20:22, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Schools belong in the encyclopedia.  Un focused 20:35, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability. RickK 22:16, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verifiable and NPOV stub. I agree with WP:SCH. Double Blue  (Talk) 22:49, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Just another crap nomination. CalJW 05:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Twickenham. For those who rely on WP:SCH as a justification you should really read WP:SCH and you would see that articles like this are not how it should be done. Vegaswikian 05:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say I agree with it if I hadn't read it. That may be how it should be done but it isn't how it was done in this case. If someone wants to merge it, I won't quarrel but I also don't advocate it. It's perfectly valid as an expandable stub. Double Blue  (Talk) 01:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Twickenham and delete - Skysmith 08:20, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quale 21:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Twickenham and delete. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 10:11, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'll vote to delete every crap fluff article about schools until there's an article on every supermarket, pub, McDonalds and street. And for the love of God I pray that never happens. Proto 11:21, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep on keeping school articles on Wikipedia. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 22:30, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Schools belong on Wikipedia. -CunningLinguist 16:33, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is quite a depressing place these days.  A noble attempt at creating an interactive, informative, encyclopedia being slowly ruined because an apparent majority of users equate random trivia with knowledge and virtually unlimited capactiy as a call to elmintate all standards.  I hope wikipedia can correct itself, but if it does not, I hope the next project that attemps to realize this goal does a better job. Indrian 04:07, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * This article makes wikipedia more informative, and deleting it hardly makes it more interactive. I agree that wikipedia is a depressing place, but I'm determined to stick with it and preserve as much value as possible. Kappa 11:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * As am I. I find it unfortunate that we disagree so fundamentally, but I realize that you are doing what you think is best.  I assure you, my motives are just as noble. Indrian 03:42, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please it depresses me most that we keep having this pointless debate Yuckfoo 16:33, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .