Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ornaments from the Silver Arcade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 23:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Ornaments from the Silver Arcade

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM Mo ainm  ~Talk  21:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. It most certainly does not fail the GNG or the guideline for albums. Check out all these reviews, which Google offered on the first page of a search: . There's plenty more on the pages after that too. Poor article, but that will be solved by editing, not by deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * *Note: I added these delsort templates but forgot to add them to the lists. Done now. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 12:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article is an unreferenced stub, but it can be improved as coverage exists. Peter E. James (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment I didn't think that reviews constituted significant coverage. Mo ainm  ~Talk  22:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * They do. In fact, reviews of albums, singles, films, are frequently the best kind of significant coverage we can provide. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously. This is a poor nomination; there is sufficient coverage to pass GNG, and the record certainly passes NALBUM. Big  Dom  09:02, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the reasons above. - SudoGhost (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.