Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orthodontic Associates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Yank sox  02:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Orthodontic Associates
Contested prod. User has put some effort into expanding this article but it's still not clear why this is distinct from the hundreds of other dental practices with this name. Used to be a short ad, and now it reads like a long ad. Opabinia regalis 00:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - you're right; it does read like an ad. - Richardcavell 01:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Richardcavell. Also lists non-notable people. -- Tu s  pm (C 02:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like and ad, the article uses "well known" to decribe the practice, and it is 100% cruft! Adam 1212 03:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete There is nothing about this article that is not blatant advertising. Wikipedia is not an advertising service. --Xrblsnggt 03:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Almost all content copied from: http://www.orthodonticassoc.com/doctors.html . Medtopic 06:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  13:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable, using WP as billboard. NawlinWiki 16:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - not notable. -- Big  top  ( tk | cb | em | ea ) 17:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as insufficiently notable. Bucketsofg✐ 23:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, simple adcopy for a common dental/orth practice. With some resumes thrown in.  Kuru  talk  00:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it is both vanity and advertising. -Colonial One 15:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no demonstrable claim to notability. Some medical practice groups may have real claims to notability (famous clients, writeups in national publications), but this one is nowhere near the bar. Sertrel 23:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.