Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orvana Ghai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Concensus reflects failure to meet WP:AUTHOR through a lack of significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Philg88 ♦talk 06:34, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Orvana Ghai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks coverage in reliable sources. All of the sources presented here are either self-published or are mentions in book catalogues, which only confirm that subject is indeed an author. But these does not establish notability. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 05:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep On Google, so many picture and information are available about her. Her books were best selling. So I think, she's notable. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 17:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Google turns up only catalogs, which are barely filled in. Any coverage is tangential related to a book she co-wrote. Fails WP:AUTHOR. BethNaught (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:39, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 20:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * delete This is a typical page for a non-yet-notable author. There are no 3rd party references. There are no 'bestseller' lists to determine the importance/spread of the author. The books are published by a publisher that is very close to being a vanity press - an "indie" press developed by an author. Such a press *could* become a significant vehicle for books, but it is as yet too young (2011), and from the web site it isn't clear if there is any editorial staff. If books are published without editorial work, then this is not a quality press. LaMona (talk) 16:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete-Too soon, if ever. Wgolf (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.