Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orville Tiamson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 02:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Orville Tiamson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As per WP:NPOV, WP:SOAP, WP:AUTOBIO, WP:IRS, and especially WP:NOTE, I'm nominating it for deletion. Orville Tiamson does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability (no major exhibitions or citations, 64 likes on Facebook (not the most official measure of notability, but still significant)), and the article is almost all self-written, with his own website and Facebook as two of the five citations. Pcwendland (talk) 13:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Only independent, reliable source making mention of him is the Philippine Star. Not enough coverage to write an article with or demonstrate notability. 舎利弗 (talk) 01:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Comment One more paywalled source available via Highbeam, it's the Manila Bulletin, 2010,, the text is the same as , which wouldn't be a reliable source itself, of course, but it does match the official copy at Highbeam.  That it's largely an interview hits the independence issue, though.  --j⚛e deckertalk 15:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Go  Phightins  !  18:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails GNG, IMO; also some SPIP going on here, I think. Quis separabit?  20:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.