Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OsFree


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-09 10:33Z 

OsFree

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested speedy, relisted for full AfD. Article on a (for now) non-notable non-existant future product (WP:CRYSTAL) -- until it exist, and can be compliant with WP:ATT (no self-referencing/self-published sources), it doesn't merit inclusion. /Blaxthos 01:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. /Blaxthos 01:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added several other sources from sources external to osFree's main site before your nomination for deletion. Also, the project does exist in some form, though not a complete form. Also there are about 17, 900 pages about it on Google, which is slightly more than Magnussoft ZETA which has an article here that isn't up for deletion, an article not deleted. It's not a Linux by any means, but there is some activity. ---  Jacques Pirat  - Talk : Contribs 02:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources added aren't independent- the only independent source provides all of two sentences about the project, stating "These projects are called Voyager and OSFree" and then later states "the project exists as a set of design outlines and some test code." --Wafulz 03:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. "...had no progress so far..." It has no notability because it hasn't done anything yet. This isn't a blog.  (removed unhelpful even if warranted comments) Shenme 03:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not a crystal ballBalloonman 05:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a Google hit for "osfree" is not the same thing as a page about it. My name get a decent number of ghits, and there aren't any pages about me. No decent sources, far as I can see.--Djrobgordon 06:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet requirements. - Denny 18:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.