Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osama F5 Boxer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Osama F5 Boxer

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

More than likely self promotion. My before search only found the subject's social media accounts. Fails WP:GNG. – 2 . O . Boxing  19:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  19:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  19:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Only sources appear to be Facebook or YouTube; doesn't meet WP:GNG. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 08:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NBOX. --Donniediamond (talk) 10:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Certainly not notable as a boxer. More importantly, there appears to be a lack of coverage to show WP:GNG is met.  Youtube videos are not sufficient. Papaursa (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - meet neither GNG or NBOX. Promotional article by COI/UPE editor.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.