Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osarhieme Osadolor (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW, I think the nominator has gotten the point(s). (non-admin closure) — VersaceSpace  🌃 19:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Osarhieme Osadolor
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:PROF missing; non-notable academia subject Morpho achilles (talk) 10:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment this was closed as KEEP on 12 July. What is the basis for a new nomination so soon afterwards? Mccapra (talk) 12:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: The subject meets WP:NPROF per “” Vice Chancellor is the highest administrative position of every university in Nigeria.  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  11:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * However, an interim/acting VC/president/etc. has a fundamentally different process of appointment than a substantive VC; most critically it lacks the committee vetting, selectivity, interviews, and full board approval that made holding the position an inclusion criterion in the first place. See the strict process for appointment of substantive VCs outlined by the Universities (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2003, and compare that to the temporary appointment-by-fiat by the governor in the case of Osadolor (and others). Moreover, there has been a crisis identified specifically in Nigerian universities, also outlined here by former VC and distinguished professor Ayodeji Olukoju, regarding VC appointments that should give some pause when considering even permanent positions for C6. Of course those issues can and do arise in any country, but it seems this has been a significant, well-reported, and widespread problem in Nigeria recently. JoelleJay (talk) 18:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: No call to reopen a discussion a few days after previous discussion was closed as keep. Take it to WP:DRV if there are questions about how the prior discussion was handled. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 13:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as no case is offered for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Grief. I nominated him first time around and can't quite get why this was opened again so soon after that close. Did I like the result? I did not. Was it the result of consensus? It was - and should now stand. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.