Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Danielson (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --MelanieN (talk) 01:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Oscar Danielson (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a completely unnecessary disambiguation page, and has been superseded by a hatnote. Nothing links here and is thus unhelpful as a navigational tool. See WP:2DABS for a better explanation: "If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is not needed—it is sufficient to use a hatnote on the primary topic article, pointing to the other article." Tavix | Talk  17:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: Prod was declined by User:Dweller with the reason given that it is harmless. Tavix | Talk  17:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Tavix |  Talk  17:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment WP:2DAB reads: "Some disambiguation pages with "(disambiguation)" in the title list only two meanings, one of them being the primary topic. In such cases, the disambiguation page is not strictly necessary, but is harmless." --Dweller (talk) 17:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: useless page, and its existence can only encourage misguided editors to create more similar pages, instead of using a simple hatnote to guide readers in one click to the non-primary-topic article they seek. Pam  D  09:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:2DAB, hatnote will get the reader there faster and with less confusion., you've left off the rest of the guideline: The recommended practice in these situations is to place a hatnote on the primary topic article to link directly to the secondary topic. Boleyn (talk) 18:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per 2D, Widefox ; talk 22:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.