Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Humphries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Oscar Humphries

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fixing incomplete nomination by. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 22:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The nominator has not given a reason for deletion. - Pointillist (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – passes the WP:BASIC test "multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other and independent of the subject." I'm not referring to all the froth about his personal life, it is his Apollo editorship that make him high profile: there's tons of reliable stuff if you google "Oscar Humphries" Apollo . - Pointillist (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - if the Telegraph calls you controversial, then you are notable. Bearian (talk) 16:19, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Editor of Apollo is notable. I notice that I tagged this for notability at an earlier point--the editorship was already in the article, so I was wrong to to do so-- I must have overlooked that.   DGG ( talk ) 21:27, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per others. Johnbod (talk) 14:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep seems notable...Modernist (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.