Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osfest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. consensus is the topic meets GNG, if barely. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Osfest

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PRODded on the grounds that "A BEFORE provides no evidence of notability for this short run music festival" and PROD declined in part: "Needs a cleanup, but with sources including the BBC, WalesOnline, and NME, I feel this is notable"

The sources, which I also found, do not establish notability. The WalesOnline piece is the best, but it really wasn't in depth coverage of the festival. BBC was announcing its postponement and NME was significantly more about the a particular band participating. Others that I found simply discussed that it was happening, and some event listings. There is nothing to indicate WP:ORG (as I assume NMUSIC doesn't quite apply) or that this festival had much of an impact and therefore notice. Star  Mississippi  19:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  19:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  19:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  19:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  19:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I feel the WalesOnline source meets the requirements set out by GNG, as in, it is independent, verifiable, and significant coverage. The BBC source is short, though I feel it goes above routine coverage as it contains additional info, it is not only about the postponement. The BBC is also a national broadcaster, which I feel improves the case for notability. Agreed that the NME article is more about Razorlight than the festival itself, but this helps show that major bands did play at this event. There are additional sources available, I feel there is enough coverage available to meet GNG. NemesisAT (talk) 21:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, enough coverage for GNG.Jackattack1597 (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 02:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The coverage from reliable sources is adequate. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.