Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osiris Entertainment (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Normally, I would relist the nomination, but given that the article has no reliable sources, that nobody voted even weak keep in two nominations, and that the nominator arguments are pretty elaborate and based on policies, I just go ahead and delete the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Osiris Entertainment
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I nominated this back in April 2012, but it was closed as no consensus after nobody voted on it. I'm re-nominating it again for the same reasons. I tried giving it time to gain sources, but instead it's been used as an advert for the company. The problem here is that there's ultimately no notability for this company, not enough to pass WP:CORP. The company is occasionally mentioned in passing in articles for other things, but they've never actually gained any in-depth coverage. None of their films have ever gained enough coverage to merit articles and they've either been redirected or outright deleted. The most I can find that actually mentions the company is this article. That's not enough to merit an article. Everything else is either trivial, primary, or on sites such as this one that's of dubious usability. (And even then the article isn't actually about the company, but about one of their films.) In the meantime the article has become a fairly promotional mess as various IPs come on to puff up the prose even more. I know that's not a reason to delete in and of itself, but this is kind of a good example of a company with little to borderline notability that has a promotional article on Wikipedia. I'd speedy it as sheer promotion, but I'd like to give it another chance through AfD before doing that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete If the material they produce or distribute is no more notable than the ones listed here, they aren't a notable company.  DGG ( talk ) 00:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.