Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oskar Hordnes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Oskar Hordnes

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 04:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 04:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep (changed from “comment”) WP:ANYBIO says anyone who has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionary is likely to be notable. I’m not sure if Store norske leksikon is the “standard national biographical dictionary” in Norway, but if it is, the subject is probably notable. Mccapra (talk) 05:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ANYBIO since Store norske leksikon is indeed the standard encyclopedia, and the article has existed since it was a paper encyclopedia. It would be utterly far-fetched to claim that Wikipedia should have fewer articles than a paper encyclopedia. Geschichte (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being chief of police of Norway's second-largest city would seem to be a notable enough and has an entry in the paper version of Store norske leksikon in any case. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.