Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osker

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted already. Woohookitty 04:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Osker
Assuming the contributor wrote the altsound bio as well, this is still a piece of vanity. Otherwise it would be a copyvio from Delete - Mgm|(talk) July 6, 2005 11:04 (UTC) Capitalistroadster 6 July 2005 23:41 (UTC)
 * yurs, not one link? Cut'n'Paste for sure. Delete --Excession 6 July 2005 13:48 (UTC)
 * Keep if cleaned up, they are on Epitaph Records, seem notable enough. --Etacar11 6 July 2005 22:58 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio. Has it been reported? I would vote keep for even a stub on this band as they meet Wikimusic Project guidelines having released two albums on a notable independent label in Epitaph Records. See
 * Delete copyvio. JamesBurns 7 July 2005 09:18 (UTC)
 * Comment. Tagged as copyvio and listed on WP:CP. --Nabla 2005-07-07 14:49:28 (UTC)
 * Keep' and rewrite. It is in fact a copyvio, from User:68.38.148.76, who's earned himself a 24-hour block for spamming over 100 band articles with altsounds links.  I've been going through and reverting each one that wasn't copyvio.  Thanks for your help, MacGyverMagic. :-) --Idont Havaname 01:56, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.