Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osmołowszczyzna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep Settlements are inherently notable. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Osmołowszczyzna

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject of the article lacks notability. Malatinszky (talk) 14:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Snowball Keep, villages are automatically notable per WP:IHN. Mjroots (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Real villages are inherently notable. Edward321 (talk) 15:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  --  fr33k  man   -s-  15:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a populated, legally recognized village, and as such is considered notable per Notability (geography).  Baileypalblue (talk) 15:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - There is a long, long, long list of precedents that we do not delete legally recognized population centres. Grandmartin11 (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.