Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OsmoEngine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 02:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

OsmoEngine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable video game engine. The1337gamer (talk) 11:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 11:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:HOAX; an otherwise non-notable fake "game engine" failing WP:GNG with no independent, reliable, in-depth sources. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 23:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's not much for a better article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  08:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, no mention by the actual Khronos Group nor any reliable source, this just reeks of being a hoax. Even if not, there's insufficient coverage to establish notability. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Looking at the content cloesly, you're right, it's a hoax. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 22:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weighing everything (including my searches which found nothing solid at all), I've tagged it as G3. SwisterTwister   talk  23:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.