Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ossë


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 00:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Ossë

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable fictional character. The only reliable sources I can find mentioning this character only mention him in passing (for instance, in a list of one hundred-odd names found only in the works of Tolkien). Fails WP:GNG. Soft delete and redirect to Maiar is also acceptable. Hog Farm (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Ossë is one of the most obscure characters in The Silmarillion. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 10:06, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete It is amazing that people had the patientce to create articles on such minor characters. At one point did we have articles on every name used in all the works of Tolkien?John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment This article was first created in July 2002. That is very early in the history of Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous comments.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Ossë, can you see, by the dawn's early light, any notability? Me neither. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete,Per nom. fails notability. Alex-h (talk) 14:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per my prod rationale (fails GNG). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG and now it is a WP:SNOW delete. Wm335td (talk) 21:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable Tolkiencruft per wp:gng. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 14:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.