Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ostent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Soft redirect to Wiktionary. Stifle (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Ostent

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, needs to be deleted and/or moved to Wiktionary. &raquo; \ / (⁂) 11:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Move to wiktionary. Once it's there, it can be speedied under G5 A5 without wasting time on discussion. - Mgm|(talk) 13:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you mean G6? The article does not appear to have been created by a banned user. Guest9999 (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * My mistake, I meant A5 (transwikified material) - Mgm|(talk) 10:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Soft redirect to wiktionary. It's a possible search term, so we shouldn't delete it outright, but there's not enough there to make an article.-- S Marshall   Talk / Cont  02:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Make it a soft redirect per S Marshall.  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  04:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.