Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osto system model


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will restore for anybody who wishes to work on the article. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Osto system model

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable system. Seems to have been copied from somewhere else but I can not find where. The Banner talk 10:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:47, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister   talk  06:47, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * keep and move sources from German Wikipedia- no sources I can recognize from this version Found the sources in the German Wikipedia.  Poor translation from German.  This article also exists on the German Wikipedia.  See OSTO_Systemmodell.   DangerDogWest (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I linked the article to its German Counterpart. The originating article contains images and sources.  Seems to be some sort of German Management System for large companies. DangerDogWest (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 04:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move to draft space until all outstanding issues are resolved. bd2412  T 13:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - I am not familiar with this theory, but I suspect it actually is notable, albeit most of the sources for it are in German rather than English. I think, if something is notable in German, it must be notable in English too, even if it is hard to find English language sources. Whatever the faults of the current article, I don't think deletion is the answer. (But I don't have a strong opinion on this.) SJK (talk) 08:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 22:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.