Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osuma StreetWear (OSW)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Osuma StreetWear (OSW)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable brand. No reliable or third-party sources on Google, zero news or news archive hits. The brand may be notable in Scandinavia, but I don't see any evidence I'm afraid. Whilst it is not obviously promotional, it seems to fail WP:GNG Mabalu (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  16:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Can't find independent sources. LK (talk) 04:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The city.fi review of the year's products in 2007 is not strong enough to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH on its own, and I'm not locatng anything further. AllyD (talk) 09:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.