Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otaka's scoop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete as A7 (non notable web content) by me. J Milburn (talk) 16:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Otaka's scoop
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Non-encyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't this be sent under WP:CSD, no assertion of significance? A very brief search turns up one hit: itself. I haven't looked at Cosmos, BlogPulse, or the other "blogspheres", but I'm not sure if that would even add to notability. Yng  varr  16:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. I agree, there is no assertion of notability here, no evidence of it, it qualifies as non-notable web content, and it was speedied once before.  Accounting4Taste: talk 16:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This article has so many problems with notability, OR, and so on, that it would likely take longer to list them all than this discussion will last.-- Oni Ookami Alfador Talk 16:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.