Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otar Japaridze


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, no outstanding delete votes (besides nom), and appears to pass WP:GNG. non admin closure  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 14:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Otar Japaridze

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Appears to fail WP:ATHLETE unless the World Junior Championship is considered the highest amateur level of a sport. I would think that "junior" would make that answer no. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. A world championship is the highest level of any sport. The word "junior" is just an indication of the age of the competitors. A cursory Google search shows plenty of coverage to meet WP:GNG. P.S. If you are going to nominate more than one similar article with the same reason, please bundle them. - Mgm|(talk) 10:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I originally had them grouped, but this one had more of a claim of notability (Georgian National champ), so I felt they should be evaluated individually. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, competed at the highest level of sport on national level (Georgian national champion) and competed at the World Junior championships, which passes WP:FIGURE/N. He qualified an Olympic spot at the 2009 Nebelhorn Trophy, though it remains to be seen if it will be used. I haven't seen anything definitive yet on if Allison Reed is eligible to compete for Georgia at the Olympics, but Georgia, afaik, has not given up the spot. Kolindigo (talk) 00:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @235  · 04:38, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.